Ostrom-Augmented Public Goods Evaluation

Evaluate Octant ecosystem projects against Elinor Ostrom's 8 Design Principles for commons governance — the Nobel Prize-winning framework from Governing the Commons (1990), translated for digital public goods. Every score is evidence-based, independently evaluated, and attestable on-chain via EAS on Base.

Collection: Octant + Karma + SocialAnalysis: Quant + Qual + OstromMechanism: Ostrom Design Principles
0
Projects Evaluated
8
Ostrom Principles Scored
3
Independent Evaluators
Base
EAS Attestation Chain

The 8 Design Principles

1Clearly Defined Boundaries
2Congruence with Local Conditions
3Collective-Choice Arrangements
4Monitoring
5Graduated Sanctions
6Conflict-Resolution Mechanisms
7Rights to Organize
8Nested Enterprises

From Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons (Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 90-102. Adapted for digital public goods evaluation.

Evaluated Projects

Loading projects...

How It Works

Wave 1 — Collect

Four data agents gather information in parallel: Octant project data, Karma GAP accountability scores, GitHub/Farcaster/X social activity, and ecosystem metrics from DefiLlama, OSO, and L2Beat.

Wave 2 — Evaluate

Three independent evaluators score the project without seeing each other's work: quantitative metrics (0-100), qualitative narrative (150-300 words with evidence), and Ostrom commons governance (8 principles).

Wave 3 — Synthesize

Synthesis agents combine all evaluations into an Ostrom radar chart report and produce EAS attestation JSON ready for on-chain recording on Base.